Find, manage, judge and cite clinical evidence the way a junior medical writer or medical-information associate does: turn a question into a PICO search, run it in PubMed with Boolean logic and MeSH, screen and record results in a PRISMA flow, keep every reference in a reference manager, appraise a randomised trial and check its reporting against CONSORT, then cite it in Word in the journal's style. It teaches the method behind a literature review; it does not teach meta-analysis statistics or replace a librarian-led systematic review protocol.
What you will be able to answer
A senior medical writer asks you for the evidence on whether SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart-failure hospitalisation in adults with type 2 diabetes, for a slide deck due on Friday. What can you produce?
A documented evidence pack: the question written as PICO; a reproducible PubMed search string combining MeSH and free-text terms with its result count and date; a PRISMA-style record of how many records were screened, excluded and kept; every included paper stored in a shared reference-manager library; a short appraisal of the key randomised trials covering randomisation, blinding, attrition and reporting against CONSORT; and slide notes cited in the requested journal style — without overstating what a non-systematic search can conclude.
One payment
₹99
The videos are free
Course outline
Concept 1
Concept 1 · Turn a clinical question into a searchable PICO question
Concept 2
After: pico-question
AND narrows, OR widens, and one misplaced bracket can hide the trial you needed.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 3
After: pubmed-boolean-search
Authors call it heart attack, myocardial infarction or MI — MeSH lets one term find all three.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 4
After: mesh-terms
A reviewer should be able to see exactly how 1,200 search results became the 9 papers you used.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 5
After: pubmed-boolean-search
The reference you can't find again is the one the reviewer asks about.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 6
After: screening-and-prisma
A trial can be published in a top journal and still not answer the question it claims to.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 7
After: rct-critical-appraisal
If a trial report doesn't say how patients were randomised, CONSORT is how you notice it's missing.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
Concept 8
After: reference-manager-library
Change a journal's citation style for 80 references in one click — or by hand for a whole evening.
Video title and channel appear once unlocked.
16 candidates did not meet the course criteria.
Translating clinical data into standardized documents: Clinical Study Reports, Investigator Brochures, CTD modules on the regulatory side; manuscripts, educational content, and slide decks on the scientific side. Your therapeutic depth makes you strongly preferred over B.Pharm for complex clinical documents — but English writing quality is the true gate, and entry runs through brutal pre-hire writing assessments at MedComms agencies and firms like Indegene and TCS.
10 mapped employers
Explore path →The aspirational Pharm.D destination: a peer-to-peer scientific expert bridging the pharma company and Key Opinion Leader physicians — discussing trial data, therapeutic outcomes, and strategy, without selling. Direct fresher entry is virtually impossible; the realistic route is 3–5 years in an in-house Scientific Advisor / Medical Information role (or PV / medical writing), building deep therapeutic-area credibility, then moving to the field-based MSL track.
6 mapped employers
Explore path →